Exploring the greatest new and classic plays

SUPPORT OUR PODCAST BY BECOMING A PATRON
CLICK HERE

Photo © Marc Brenner

Our Town – Footnotes

Jun 15, 2026 | Footnotes | 0 comments

These Footnotes accompany our episode on Thornton Wilder’s American classic Our Town, and include additional notes on Wilder’s approach to staging, his theme of the archaeology of history, and the sacramental tone and message of the play.

Not listened to the episode yet? You’ll find it here.

No Curtain. No Scenery.
These are the first instructions in the printed stage directions of the text of Our Town, and they are a succinct representation of Thornton Wilder’s expressed views on the nature of theatre at the time that he wrote the play. He thought by the 1930s that theatre had become too safe – had lost its ambition to address deeper ideas about our existence. He railed particularly against naturalism because he thought that the more that a stage set tried to represent reality, the more it limited the imagination. In fact, he wrote A Preface putting forward these views to accompany the opening of Our Town, which appeared in the New York Times in February 1938. The sub-heading of the published article read: “In which Mr Wilder discusses such matters as Realism, Convention, Even Scenery, in Connection with Grover’s Corners.”

It is worth quoting from this Preface. Wilder wrote:
“The theatre longs to represent the symbols of things, not the things themselves…when the theatre pretends to give the real thing in canvas and wood and metal it loses something of the realer thing, which is its true business…Every concrete object on the stage fixes and narrows the action to one moment in time…When you emphasize place in the theatre, you drag down and limit and harness time to it. You thrust the action back into the past time…whereas it is precisely the glory of the stage that it is always ‘now’ there.” He said he “tried to capture not verisimilitude but reality…I tried to restore significance to the small details of life by removing scenery.” 

Wilder includes an ironic nod to theatrical convention in a stage direction early on in the text that actually specifies that “two arched trellises, covered with vines and flowers are pushed on”, to suggest gardens, and the Stage Manager then says to the audience somewhat impishly, “There’s some scenery for those who think they have to have scenery.”

Wilder intended that Our Town be performed on a mostly bare stage. The stage directions call for a table, a few chairs, and a couple of ladders, and the actors mime actions without the use of props. For example, Mrs Gibbs pulls up an imaginary window and starts making a fire in a stove; the doctor sets down his imaginary black bag; the newspaper boy hurls imaginary papers into doorways; and the milkman crosses the stage leading an imaginary horse and wagon. Stage directions do suggest that sounds can be added clinking milk bottles, a factory whistle, or church bells. The result is that the staging feels very inventive, stimulating our imagination to fill in the world. The two ladders, for example, serve at one point to indicate the first floors of the neighbouring Webb and Gibbs’ houses, where George and Emily talk to each other from their respective bedroom windows. And in Act 3 of the recent Welsh National Theatre production the dead sit atop the ladders, their verticality evoking the tombstones, but also placing them in an appropriately liminal position, part way between earth and heaven.

As we noted in the podcast the actors re-assembling the set on the fly creates a great sense of energy and fluency in the staging. It allows scenes to take place simultaneously on different areas of the stage; for example, when the Webb and Gibbs families are having breakfast, each in their own neighbouring kitchens, but with overlapping dialogue. The multiple locations conjure the collective life of the town.

Finally, as we noted in the podcast, the lack of set allows that Our Town could be any town. Although the text is very specific in its description of Grover’s Corners, somehow it still allows for it to be transposed to other places, countries or communities. For example, the recent Welsh National Theatre production painted a picture of Our Town as a Welsh village, a sense partly enhanced by Michael Sheen’s lyrical Welsh accent, but also by their including references to the Welsh names of the local mountains. Otherwise, all of the other descriptions of Grover’s Corners were as per the original text. The play is not burdened with a site or time-specific set, and the universal nature of the play shines through as Wilder intended.

 

Michael Sheen as the Stage Manager
with a few boards as “scenery”.
Welsh National Theatre
Photo by Helen Murray

A couple of ladders

The archaeology of history
We talked in the podcast about the treatment of time in the play, and specifically the perspective that the Stage Manager presents on the life span of Grover’s Corners. He sets the scenes that we watch in the past, as well as tells us about the future lives of some of the characters. He even refers to the geological origins of the location. All of this establishes a sense of these individual lives and the community itself passing within a larger continuum of history. This was one of Wilder’s deliberate themes in the play, as the Stage Manager himself tells us in his thought-provoking speech about what is lost to history, telling us that,
“Babylon once had two million people in it, and all we know about ‘em is the names of kings and some copies of wheat contracts and contracts for the sale of slaves. Yet every night all those families sat down to supper, and the father came home from work, and the smoke went up the chimney – same as here. And even in Greece and Rome, all we know about the real life of the people is what we can piece together out of the joking poems and the comedies they wrote for the theatre back then.
So I’m going to have a copy of this play put in the cornerstone (of the new bank) and the people a thousand years from now’ll know a few simple facts about us – more than the Treaty of Versailles and the Lindbergh flight…So – people a thousand years from now – this is the way we were in the provinces north of New York at the beginning of the twentieth century – This is the way we were: in our growing up and in our marrying and in our living and in our dying.” 

Wilder talked in his New York Times Preface about the inspiration for this idea about the record of history:
“For a while in Rome I lived among archaeologists, and ever since I find myself occasionally looking at the things about me as an archaeologist will look at them a thousand years hence…an archaeologist’s eyes combine the view of the telescope with the view of the microscope. He reconstructs the very distant with the help of the very small.”

He asks, “What is the relation between the countless ‘unimportant’ details of our daily life, on the one hand, and the great perspectives of time, social history, and current religious ideas, on the other?…What is trivial and what is significant about any one person’s making a breakfast, engaging in a domestic quarrel, in a ‘love scene’, in dying.” He is seeking to address the universal in the specific, to reconstruct “the life of a village against the life of the stars”, as he had it.

He is trying to elevate the importance of an individual life within the expanse of the world and time. It put me in mind of Arthur Miller’s later theory of drama, that tragedy is not just about kings and queens. Our Town is a celebration of ordinary people, and of our short, “awful and wonderful” lives, as Mrs Soames puts it.

Wilder has achieved his archaeological aim. The Stage Manager’s self-conscious intention to preserve the play itself as a future record of the life of Grover’s Corners has of course been realised in its being perpetually played.

 

The “eternal part”
Our Town is not uncommonly dismissed as “sentimental”, but the critic John Lahr described it more accurately I think as “sacramental”. The inclusion of the hymns that the choir sings perhaps add to this sense of the sacramental. The message of the hymn Blessed be the ties that bind that Wilder specifies is one of community, and the sharing of burdens, fears and hopes in this life.

While the Stage Manager’s philosophical speech about the characters’ afterlives is almost religious in its grasping for the eternal.
“We all know that something is eternal…there’s something way down deep that’s eternal about every human being…, he starts, You know as well as I do that the dead don’t stay interested in us living people for very long. Gradually, gradually, they lose hold of the earth…and the ambitions they had…and the pleasures they had…and the things they suffered…and the people they loved.
They get weaned from the earth – that’s the way I put it – weaned away.
And they stay here while the earth part of ‘em burns away, burns out; and all that time they slowly get indifferent to what’s goin’ on in Grover’s Corners.
They’re waitin’. They’r waitin’ for something that they feel is comin’. Something important and great. Aren’t they waitin’ for the eternal part in them to come out clear?”  

The fact that it is finally left as a question affirms the yearning, unknowability of such an idea or hope.

 

The Texts
If you are interested in buying the play text or other related books, we’d be delighted if you choose to purchase them by following the links below. We will earn a small commission on every book you purchase, which helps to keep the podcast going. You will also be supporting an independent bookseller. Thank you.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You might also be interested in …
113 – Arcadia by Tom Stoppard

113 – Arcadia by Tom Stoppard

Tom Stoppard’s 1993 play, Arcadia, is viewed by many as his finest play, renowned for the breadth of its intellectual interrogations and its formal invention. The play is a structural masterpiece of ideas, as well as a teasing detective story, joyous comedy, and emotionally rich exploration of love and loss.

As we record this episode a wonderful new production of Arcadia is playing at the Duke of York’s theatre in London’s West End, following its acclaimed run at the Old Vic theatre earlier this year. I am delighted to share the challenge and the pleasure of exploring Stoppard’s dazzling drama with the director of the new production, Carrie Cracknell.

112 – Glengarry Glen Ross by David Mamet

112 – Glengarry Glen Ross by David Mamet

David Mamet’s modern American classic, Glengarry Glen Ross, is a blistering commentary on the cut-throat reality of the American dream, and its poisonous impact on those who have bought into the myth and machismo of that dream. The play had its world premiere in the small Cottesloe theatre at the National Theatre in London in September 1983, and was first performed in New York the following year, winning the Pulitzer Prize for Drama. Mamet also wrote the extended screenplay for the star-studded 1992 film version.

As we recorded this episode a new production of the play was playing at the Old Vic theatre in London, with an all-female cast. This is a particularly provocative idea, because one of the primary themes of this play is masculine identity, and the salesmen in this Chicago office do not hold back in their display of machismo.

To explore Mamet’s unflinching slice of 1980s dog-eat-dog capitalism, I am joined by arts journalist Mark Lawson.

111 – The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui by Bertolt Brecht

111 – The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui by Bertolt Brecht

Bertolt Brecht’s ‘gangster spectacle’, The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui, is both an exuberant and funny piece of theatre, and a chillingly topical political satire. Set in the 1930s Chicago of Al Capone, Brecht presents a parody of the rise of Hitler through the character of the gangster Arturo Ui. The play is a universal cry for vigilance against the rise of unscrupulous, populist leaders who threaten democratic societies and global peace.

As we recorded this episode a new production of the play by the Royal Shakespeare Company was playing in Stratford-upon-Avon, starring Mark Gatiss as the title character.

I am delighted to be joined by both the show’s translator, playwright Stephen Sharkey, and by Brecht scholar, Professor Tom Kuhn, to guide us through Brecht’s political parody.