Dancing at Lughnasa – Footnotes
The Footnotes to our episode on Brian Friel’s Dancing at Lughnasa include more on the meaning of dancing in the play, as well as some observations on the characters of Kate and Father Jack.
Not listened to the episode yet? You’ll find it here.
We talked in the podcast about the idea that Gerry and Chris may have met at a festival dance, and one imagines that traditonally many would go to the local dance with the hope of meeting a mate. There is a wonderful note in the programme for the National Theatre production that tells of a real Lughnasa dancing competition in County Donegal where the prize for the best male dancer was his choice of bride from the female contestants. So it can literally happen! It is also clear from Maggie’s vibrant description of the dance competition that she and Bernie O’Donnell competed in years ago, that romantic partnerships can be formed in the crucible of such events.
Dance is more than a social ritual, however. It is imbued with other meanings in the play, including its spiritual purpose in the pagan performances in Africa that Jack describes, or the darker energies that it may release in the more local versions in the hills in Donegal. In this context it can represents a challenge to the established order, particularly to the decorum of prescribed Christian behaviour. As the stage directions suggest when they describe the sisters’ dance as becoming a “frantic dervish”, with a “near hysteria being induced” , so that “there is a sense of order being consciously subverted.”.
In personal terms it offers a non-verbal expression of deeply felt desire or grief for frustrated hopes. For Chris and Gerry, for example, it is clearly one of the ways that they manifest their passion. For the others it may be more of an unconscious release of pain or even suppressed anger or determination about their thwarted dreams. Again the stage directions point this way, describing Maggie’s face when she is dancing as “animated by a look of defiance, or aggression”, and their uninhibited movement as “a pattern of action…that is out of character and at the same time ominous of some deep and true emotion.”
It is a release that reaches a level within and beyond that Michael describes so poetically in his final summation: “Dancing as if language had surrendered to movement – as if this ritual, this wordless ceremony, was now the way to speak, to whisper private and sacred things, to be in touch with some otherness. Dancing as if the very heart of life and all its hopes might be found in those assuaging notes…”.
Chris and Gerry dancing
National Theatre May 2023
Photo by Johan Persson
Michael introduces Kate as “a very proper woman”, and at times she comes across as the killjoy in the house with her strict Christian morality. She forbids the sisters from going to the Lughnasa dance, she judges Gerry most harshly, and she is deluded about Father Jack’s health and lost faith. As the eldest and only proper breadwinner, she is the self-appointed head of the house, a responsibility that she feels most keenly.
We see another Kate under the stern appearance in her love and concern for Chris, in her looking out for Michael’s future, and when she softens to the charms of Gerry in his first visit in the play. She first insists that Gerry is not welcome to stay the night, and then is sorry that he’s gone away without saying hello.
We feel more for her when we are given a glimpse of the pressure and doubts that she feels: “You perform your duties as best you can – because you believe in responsibilities and obligations and good order. And then suddenly, suddenly you realise that hair cracks are appearing everywhere; that control is slipping away; that the whole thing is so fragile it can’t be held together much longer. It’s all about to collapse.”
The personal faith she places in God and the Church is being challenged by Father Jack’s behaviour and that of the local Priest, and she fears that the family may disintegrate without the bulwark of such faith and social rectitude. In particular she worries what would befall Rose if she lost her job or died: “I must put my trust in God, Maggie. Mustn’t I? He’ll look after her, won’t he? You believe that Maggie, don’t you? When Maggie fails to explicitly agree, she continues, “I believe that , too…I believe that…I do believe that…” She doth proclaim too much.
The depth of Kate’s complex feelings is suggested finally by Michael’s brief mention that when Father Jack died she was “inconsolable” “for months”.
In the balance of the debate between Jack and Kate over his Christian faith, or lack of it, Kate associates Jack’s ill health his failure to properly express his Christian faith, and that when he returns to health he will return to the church and say mass. However although Jack’s mind may seem somewhat addled at the beginning of the play – he does not recognise the individual sisters and he struggles to find the right word – there may in fact be rational explanations for these supposed frailties beyond the symptoms of malaria. He has not seen the sisters for upwards of twenty-five years – he describes Chris being a baby when he left – so it is reasonable that he would not know them to look at as adults. His inability to speak English as fluently as we expect, may be because he has been speaking Swahili almost exclusively for many years.
In any case as his physical vigour improves, and his confidence, he becomes more lucid and enthusiastic in promoting his new-found beliefs. To the point of course where Kate is forced to accept that Jack will never be the same self again, that he has been on “his own distinctive spiritual search.”
The culmination of Jack’s journey is signalled by the mock ritual played out in the final act where Jack and Gerry exchange ceremonial hats, during which Jack states that it represents the “formal rejection of what you once had”. In his case the rejection of imperialist Britain and the Catholic church. In some way they all leave behind what they once had, or perhaps the world and time leave them behind.
Shakespeare’s devastating exploration of race, reputation and jealousy, The Tragedy of Othello, The Moor of Venice was a popular success when it was first performed during Shakespeare’s lifetime, but in the centuries since it has provoked a wide range of responses as successive generations have grappled with the racial identity of the eponymous character. As we record this episode a new production of Othello at Shakespeare’s Globe theatre in London views the play’s treatment of race through a contemporary lens, setting the play within the London Metropolitan police force, a topical environment for racial inspection.
I am privileged to welcome as my guest someone especially qualified to help us navigate the tricky waters of Shakespeare’s play, Farah Karim-Cooper, Director of Education at Shakespeare’s Globe, Professor of Shakespeare Studies at Kings College London, and the author of The Great White Bard – Shakespeare, Race and the Future.
Ken Nwosu as Othello and Ralph Davies as Iago
Sam Wanamaker Playhouse
Photo by Johan Persson
Harold Pinter’s disturbing exploration of toxic masculinity and sexual maneuvering, The Homecoming premiered in 1965. The play’s portrait of misogyny, and even more disturbing, the apparent female complicity, was shocking at the time it was written. Nearly 60 years on the sexual politics is if anything even more difficult to watch. So what was Pinter’s purpose in presenting such a provocative piece, and how do we process it in the post Me-Too age?
I am joined by Matthew Dunster, the director of a scintillating new production of the play at the Young Vic in London, who can help us answer those questions about Pinter’s challenging classic.
Lisa Diveney as Ruth at the Young Vic – photo by Dean Chalkley.
Henrik Ibsen’s dark family drama Ghosts provoked outrage when it was published in 1881, its treatment of sexual disease, incest and euthanasia too much for the critics. More than 140 years later its portrait of repressed truths and social hypocrisy remains as powerful as ever.
Professor Kirsten Shepherd-Barr of St Catherine’s College, Oxford, helps us review Ibsen’s unflinching drama.
Hattie Morahan as Helene Alving at the Sam Wanamaker Theatre, London, December 2023. Photo by Marc Brenner.