Photo © Marc Brenner

A Doll’s House – Footnotes

Apr 7, 2020 | Footnotes | 0 comments

These footnotes are a follow-up to our live discussion in episode one of the podcast, including a selection of points from my researches that we didn’t happen to include, as well as follow-up on any facts and questions that came up during our conversation with Dan.

Ibsen’s late plays 
Ibsen himself described his later plays as a “series of dramas which began with A Doll’s House and completed with When We Dead Awaken”. The list of plays that he wrote as a mature writer are the ones we are most familiar with:

1879 A Doll’s House
1881 Ghosts
1882 An Enemy of the People
1884 The Wild Duck
1890 Hedda Gabler
1892 The Master Builder
1899 When we Dead Awaken  

Title page in the manuscript of A Doll’s House 1879

Ibsen as a Bestseller
Ibsen’s plays were always published before the play was performed. He had a huge following and book sales, particularly in Norway where drama was more popular than the novel as a literary genre at the time. In his talk at the Re-imagining Nora symposium Tore Rem (editor of the Penguin editions of Ibsen’s plays), described crowds of people waiting on the dock side for the ship from Denmark to arrive and unload the first copies of one of Ibsen’s newly published plays. 8,000 copies of A Doll’s House were sold in the first month in December 1879, a healthy number even by today’s standards.

The first productions 
A Doll’s House premiered in Copenhagen in Dec 1879, closely followed by productions in Stockholm, Oslo and Bergen. It then opened in Germany, where the actress playing Nora famously refused to perform the play as written, declaring, “I would never leave my children!” Since the playwright’s wishes were not protected by copyright, Ibsen decided to avoid the danger of the play being rewritten by a lesser dramatist, by committing what he called a “barbaric outrage” on his play himself and giving it an alternative ending in which Nora did not leave. This version played in a number of German cities during 1880 but was not a success and the producer restored the original ending.

The first performance of the play in London was an adaptation called Breaking a Butterfly by Henry Arthur Jones and Henry Herman in March 1884, which was a travesty of
Ibsen’s work: Nora was saved from her rebellion and immortality by making a faithful clerk steal her promissory note from Krogstad’s desk. … The curtain fell upon a happy home.

Henrik Ibsen age 51 in 1879, the year A Doll’s House premiered, painted by Henrik Olrik in Rome

Censorship 
One of the reasons that Ibsen’s controversial plays were freely staged in Norway was that there was no state censorship; whereas in Britain the Lord Chamberlain’s office still had the power to ban a play or request changes before allowing it to be openly produced. A Doll’s House seems to have slipped through the Lord Chamberlain’s net – Nora’s actions apparently being deemed “too absurd altogether” to be obviously offensive!

Whereas his next play, Ghosts was not so fortunate. The subjects of venereal disease and incest were thought not fit for public display. Ghosts which was written two years after A Doll’s House in 1881, did not have a UK production until 10 years later and even that was a single private showing by the subscription-only Independent Theatre Society whose members included playwright George Bernard Shaw, and authors Thomas Hardy and Henry James.

The first proper British production of the play in in its original form as Ibsen wrote it opened on 7 June 1889 at the Novelty Theatre. The critics
savaged the play, but audiences loved it and the run was extended.

Before this public production there had been two private productions in its proper form in London — one featured George Bernard Shaw in the role of Krogstad!

George Bernard Shaw
was an outspoken supporter of Ibsen, championing him in his essay Quintessence of Ibsenism published in 1891. He wrote about A Doll’s House

“The ideal wife is one who does everything that her ideal husband likes and nothing else…To treat a person as a means to an end is to deny that person’s right to live.

And even more portentously:

“Nora’s revolt is the end of a chapter of human history. The slam of the door behind her is more momentous than the cannon of Waterloo or Sedan, because when she comes back, it will not be to the old home; for when the patriarch no longer rules, and the “breadwinner ” acknowledges his dependence, there is an end of the old order.”

Shaw especially admired Ibsen’s independent-minded characters who resist the hypocrisies of social convention, characters he often portrayed in his own plays. He apparently once stated that he thought Ibsen was superior to Shakespeare because the social impact of his plays. According to Shaw “A Doll’s House will be flat as ditch water when A Midsummer Night’s Dream will still be fresh as paint, but it will have done more work in the world.”

A modern tarantella dancer (photo from Catartika)

Tarantella
Ibsen moved to Sorento in Italy in 1864, where he may have learned about the Italian dance that Nora dances in the play. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica the dance is characterized by “light, quick steps and teasing, flirtatious behaviour. The tarantella’s origin is connected with tarantism, a disease or form of hysteria that appeared in Italy in the 15th to the 17th century and that was obscurely associated with the bite of the tarantula spider; victims seemingly were cured by frenzied dancing.” What has bitten Nora?!

The enduring impact of A Doll’s House in our contemporary times
Hattie Morahan, who played Nora in the Young Vic’s production of the play a few years ago revealed at the Re-Imagining Nora symposium that she and her fellow cast members knew people personally who decided to leave their partners after seeing the play. That is the power of theatre!

The Texts

If you are interested in buying the play text or other related books, we’d be delighted if you choose to purchase them by following the links below. We will earn a small commission on every book you purchase, which helps to keep the podcast going. You will also be supporting an independent bookseller. Thank you.

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Suggest a play

We’re always open to suggestions about plays to talk about, so if you’d like us to discuss a favourite of yours, please email us at plays@theplaypodcast.com. Let us know why you think we should cover it, and if you know anyone who’d be excited and qualified to talk about it with us (even yourself if modesty permits!).

Plays suggested for discussion by our Guests and Listeners - which gets your vote?
  • Add your own suggestion

You might also be interested in …

025 – Medea, by Euripides

025 – Medea, by Euripides

The dramatic tragedy of a wife who murders her own two sons in a desperate act of grief and revenge remains as disturbing and deeply moving as when it was written nearly 2,500 years ago. Medea by Euripides is timeless not only because of our fascination with Medea’s horrific crime, but for the poetry of its language, and its unflinching portrayal of a woman all but powerless in a patriarchal world. The play was recently revived at the National Theatre with a stunning performance by Helen McCrory in the title role, which is now available to view on the National Theatre at Home. I’m joined by renowned classical scholar Edith Hall to explore our enduring fascination with Medea.

024 – Consent, by Nina Raine

024 – Consent, by Nina Raine

The main characters in Nina Raine’s play Consent are barristers contesting a brutal rape case. As the case unfolds the lawyers’ marriages come unravelled and they themselves cross the line of honour or even of the law. Consent explores some of the most charged issues of our time: the sources of sexual betrayal and violence, the ambiguities of consent, and the failings of the justice system to account proportionally or sensitively with cases of sexual abuse. I am delighted and honoured to be joined in this episode by the author of Consent, Nina Raine, and by actor Adam James, who appeared in the National Theatre production in the role of Jake.

023 – Footnotes Volume 2

023 – Footnotes Volume 2

Footnotes Volume 2 is a selection of facts and observations culled from the library of information that we’ve compiled to accompany each of the plays in the past ten episodes. These include fascinating bits of trivia as well as more extended exploration of specific aspects of the plays. A smorgasbord of dramatic intelligence befitting of the best kind of Footnote.

Recent Posts 

The 2020 Theatre Diary – March

The 2020 Theatre Diary – March

Before the theatres went dark this month I was lucky enough to see Caryl Churchill’s A Number at the Bridge, and spend more than seven hours in thrall to Robert Lepage’s Seven Streams of the River Ota at the National. Plus, some thoughts on what we miss when there is no theatre.

The 2020 Theatre Diary – January

The 2020 Theatre Diary – January

The January roundup included both classic plays, such as The Duchess of Malfi, Uncle Vanya and Three Sisters, as well as recent musicals Dear Evan Hansen and Girl from the North Country